Did you try to attach a file?What is this exactly ”=@FireModel(A2:E2, “C:\Users\Michael\Desktop\a la ceja 7 oct\high low test\hi lo 1000\ES 3 HI only model 1000g.md”,1) ”?
I have two concept on my to do list : one is gartley ,butterfly,bat etc.. types of Pesavento patterns.I know some traders claiming up to seventy percent success in particular with continuation Pesavento patterns.I am not sure if NSDT or CH suitable for finding the most profitable ratios.Another is not involved with ratios it is a different concept.
I attach some Pesavento patterns in excel to give you some idea.
Unfortunately I dont have the excell add in to help you out.You can directly call or write to Denham Ward or Marge Sherald from Wardsystems Support : support@wardsystems.com
As far as I understand scientific mode means you are trying regression model.Do you re-calculate your indicators(rsi ,momentum etc?) in excel from the raw data from NSDT Pro then recreate a new chaos hunter formula including the chaos var ? Then you use the chaos hunter formula as an indicator in NSDT?It sounds all little blurry.Can you shoot somee pictures or can you or I email you?
Can you explain more maybe with some pictures?I think I remember something like Steve Ward was using the value of 0.777 .
I createad a new formula with August newsletter model.My problem with Chaos Hunter is , it goes totally blank with the same data.I dont know what do I do wrong ?Or what is wrong with CH?
Neural network isnt’ about finding meaningful relationships between real indicator and data.If you look at the Ward newsletters ,their most successful models created by rsi,cci,stochastic indicators which are basically normalized-detrended data.So it is all about the data.How to fit the data.If you want to find descriptive relationships between your indicators and the data try decision trees but without guaranties.
You can first predict the OBV indicator n bars ahead first ( regression) then use the the predicted OBV value as input.My experience is, this method works slightly better than the using the original indicator as input, because it is less noisy.But this is only my experience though.
